Register
Sign in
Search options
Search entire Community
Search Our work
Home
RSPB home
Community home
Wildlife
Places to visit
Get involved
Our work
Chat
About
More ...
Our work
You might be surprised to read that our work is far broader than nature reserves and Big Garden Birdwatch. Read more about what else we do.
Get RSS feed
Home
Blogs
Fuelling declines
E-mail blog author
Archive
Archives
July 2011
(1)
June 2011
(3)
May 2011
(4)
March 2011
(3)
February 2011
(2)
January 2011
(3)
December 2010
(3)
June 2010
(1)
May 2010
(2)
April 2010
(5)
March 2010
(4)
February 2010
(8)
January 2010
(8)
December 2009
(4)
November 2009
(7)
October 2009
(6)
September 2009
(6)
August 2009
(5)
July 2009
(10)
June 2009
(9)
May 2009
(9)
April 2009
(8)
March 2009
(1)
November 2008
(1)
October 2008
(8)
August 2008
(5)
July 2008
(5)
June 2008
(7)
May 2008
(7)
April 2008
(7)
March 2008
(10)
February 2008
(9)
January 2008
(5)
December 2007
(3)
November 2007
(3)
October 2007
(3)
September 2007
(11)
August 2007
(21)
Tags
agriculture
Big Garden Birdwatch
biodiversity
birds of prey
bittern
climate change
farming
food
freezing
garden birds
hen harriers
letter to the future
marine
Marine Act
Marine Conservation Zone
non-natives
osprey
peregrines
poisoning
rivers
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
RSPB
sea eagles
wildlife crime
winter feeding
Blogroll
Guardian Environment blog
Caught by the River
Greenpeace Climate Rescue Blog
Wildlife Extra
Nigel's Eco Blog
In the news
A week of the RSPB and wildlife in the news, delivered every Friday
RSS for posts
Fuelling declines
Cath Harris
13 Sep 2007 9:53 AM
Comments
0
Scientists are trilling at the prospect of fast growing fuel crops covering a fifth of our farmland and helping to hit targets for renewable energy generation, The Times reports.
Miscanthus grass, an Asian species, and coppiced willow trees will provide one third of green energy sources by 2020 they predict – good for the targets and good, they claim, for insects too.
But will they be good for birds?
A recent report for the RSPB and others, found that without safeguards, covering large areas of farmland with these tall crops could cause as much harm to wildlife as the switch from spring to autumn sowing and the replacement of hay with silage 35 years ago.
Farmland bird numbers plunged as a result of these, and other, widely used forms of agricultural intensification. And, despite the creation of green farming schemes since then, populations of many farmland species are still in decline.
Substantial subsidies are being made available to farmers keen to plant miscanthus and willow. But there has been almost no research on the impact of miscanthus on wildlife, which means large swathes of land could be swallowed up before we know what might happen as a result.
Bioenergy crops should be grown in a way that is sympathetic to wildlife. Why? Because these crops are being grown to help the environment and it would be a terrible own goal if they ended up damaging wildlife and landscapes instead.
If harm is done, bioenergy initiatives could hit the same buffers that wind energy projects have, setting back a promising technology in the fight against climate change.
Click
here
for the Times report
And
here
for more on the report for the RSPB
0 comments