As conservation policy advocates, my colleagues and I spend a lot of time debating the finer points of UK and EU policies. What percentage of the Pillar 1 CAP budget should be modulated to Pillar 2; how should agri-environment spending be targeted; what rules should be part of cross compliance? Important though these questions are, they don’t exactly grab the imagination of anyone who’s not already intimately involved in farming policy. And we need to grab imaginations: farming affects every one of us through the food we eat and the quality of our environment (not to mention the taxes and food prices we pay). Despite this, many people know little and care less about the policies that help to shape farming. As a result, there is little voter pressure on policy makers to make decisions on agriculture that are in the public interest.
Last year, the agriculture group of Wildlife and Countryside Link decided to take a step back from policy and remind ourselves of what we are actually trying to achieve at the end of the day: a better future for the environment and farming. We spent time discussing among ourselves and with some of the farmers we work with what this might look like and what needs to change to make it happen. The result is Farming Fit for the Future – the shared vision of a diverse group of organisations with interests ranging from wildlife conservation to landscape quality, animal welfare to cultural heritage.
Link launched Farming Fit for the Future at an event in Parliament last week, alongside Water Matters – the Link vision for the future of rivers, lakes and wetlands. The common theme of both documents is that a healthy natural environment needs to be at the heart of how we manage our resources. The event was well-attended and speakers included Secretary of State Liz Truss and arable farmer Tim Farr. Zac Goldsmith MP kindly hosted the event.
Farming Fit for the Future sets out a vision for farming that is better for nature, better for people, better for our land and our livestock, and ready for the future. We don’t anticipate that anyone would disagree with these goals, and in a way that’s the point: we need politicians, farmers, NGOs and others to look beyond the policy wrangling and start working together towards better outcomes. The vision is only the start: in the months and years to come Link will be talking to decision makers about how to make it happen.
We'd love to hear your views on Farming Fit for the Future - please post your comments below.
With over 75% of the UK land area being farmed, farming has a huge impact on all our lives and on the wildlife that calls farmland its home. RSPB works closely with farmers all over the UK, and with those that represent them. In this blog Stuart Housden, Director of RSPB Scotland, discusses a reason meeting between RSPB Scotland and the National Farmers Union Scotland (NFUS).
Rather than me tell you about it, why not read it for yourselves here. But it a great example of RSPB meeting with the farming community, showing understanding and empathy of many of the problems that affect farming but also continuing to seek solutions that will allow wildlife to flourish on farmland across the UK, and in Scotland in particular in this case.
With 2015 being the International Year of Soils it seems quite appropriate to be starting a new project to improve the condition of the soils at Hope Farm and monitor the soil biodiversity.
It is stating the obvious that soils are absolutely key to growing good crops. Well managed soils will drain better, provide better rooting potential for crops and have a range of wildlife that can actually benefit and promote crop growth. Poorly managed soils can lead to surface flooding issues and poor crop health, for example, and once soils begin the slide to poor condition it seems like a never ending cyclel.
Hope farm which has been in near continuous arable rotation for over thirty years. One of the greatest challenges is maintaining and improving the organic matter content in the soil. It has been many decades since Hope Farm was a classic mixed farm and sizeable quantities of farmyard manure were available to apply to fields to maintain and improve the organic matter content. Like the majority of other farms that converted to almost wholly arable enterprises the cropping system here increasingly relied on artificial fertilizers and evolving cultivation technology and equipment. For many it seemed the importance of the soil was somehow forgotten.
Wheat field with skylark plots at Hope Farm. Copyright Andy Hay/RSPB
Of course not everyone was so dazzled by the inputs and machinery that was available. There have been champions of soil fertility and condition, and in recent years their combined voices have become louder and greater numbers of farmers have begun to listen. This has partly been in response to a realisation that soils may be deteriorating, that inputs were becoming increasingly expensive and that pernicious weed issues were becoming more difficult to manage and part of the reason for that may be down to soil condition. Perhaps the most pressing issue is the ability of water to drain away freely especially on heavy land. Initiatives such as Catchment Sensitive Farming have helped to raise awareness of the issues of surface run off and erosion, and how much soil farms may actually be losing. Cross compliance (the rules we all have to follow to receive CAP payments) should in theory require a basic level of good practice in soil management, but in reality the rules are too weak and not well enforced enough to drive real change.
When we bought Hope Farm we inherited a purely autumn sown crop system comprising 1st and 2nd wheats, and oilseed rape. The industry wisdom at that time was this was the most appropriate cropping system for heavy land, heavily supported by a range of agri-chemicals and inputs. Nothing is constant in farming though. Fast forward 15 years and for harvest 2016 we will have a rotation including winter wheat, oilseed rape, spring barley, linseed, field beans and millet. Quite diverse for a 180ha farm.
This diversity opens up opportunities for improved management of the soil. With insufficient quantities of farmyard muck being available, and the significant cost of transporting here from areas which do have a ready supply, we looked for other options.
Green compost was one. This is created from the food and garden waste that many Local Authorities from households and businesses. Gardeners can collect the processed compost for free from local council depots, but for a farm like Hope Farm we need thousands of tonnes to make any meaningful difference. Such quantities come at a cost as well as the cost of transport. It may take several years to begin to see the difference in soil quality and crop health, and it is that time frame that often is difficult to adapt into the planning for many farms because of budgetary pressures and the tendency to focus on the short-term rather then the long-term.
The compost heap at Hope Farm. Copyright Ian Dillon/RSPB
Close up of the compost showing how rich it is in organic matter. Copyright Ian Dillon/RSPB
Another option is cover crops. These are crop mixes sown immediately after harvest and left in the ground until the following spring, thereby protecting soils over-winter from erosion, preventing nutrients from leaching into watercourses and improving the soil structure. The alternative for many is leaving fields bare which anecdotal evidence suggests exacerbates the deterioration of soil condition. While I had heard of cover crops I didn’t really know much about them until Nuffield Scholar, Tom Bradshaw, gave a talk to our local NFU Branch and then to a group of RSPB staff on the subject. Quite honestly, it was like the proverbial penny dropping. That sought after light bulb moment.
The shift away from autumn sown crops to spring sown crops on over a third of the farm provided the opportunity to put these options into practice. In the last few weeks we have had 1600 tonnes of green compost delivered and three different cover crop mixes ordered from Oakbank: black oats and vetch, forage rye and vetch, and forage rye, vetch and daikon raddish.
This week, immediately after oilseed rape harvest, we began the process of applying the compost and sowing the cover crops. Alongside this we have started a monitoring programme which will focus on the biota within the soil. Researchers from our Conservation Science department have developed a robust monitoring plan with a replicated trial of four plot types in three fields. Plot A has no intervention at all; plot B has green compost applied; plot C has a cover crop drilled the day after harvest; and plot D has both compost and green cover sown.
An example of the split plot design for monitoring soil condition and biota at Hope Farm.
Biodiversity is being monitored through collecting soil cores and vortis samples, and setting pitfall traps periodically over the coming years in these fields. This will enable us to monitor the changes in biota, soil condition and crop performance between the four treatments.
A soil core being collected at Hope Farm. Copyright Derek Gruar/RSPB
The normal monitoring of birds, butterflies, bees and moths will continue but it is very exciting to open a new era of monitoring, one that may help benefit biodiversity within the soil that most of us never see, but that may also help produce better, healthier crops for us all to enjoy.